The Buck Stops Where, Exactly?; Firing Off Overtime; A Midnight Deadline Raise.
RVA 5x5 - June 14, 2024
No algorithms. No content filters. No A.I. — Honest and insightful analysis from Richmond, VA.
Three stories today, two more on Sunday!
A look at the mess at the Voter Registrar’s Office and how the “leadership” at City Hall thinks it is immune from Harry Truman’s #1 lesson.
Just as the deadline approaches to settle 400+ meals tax accounts on July 1, the city fires staff from the Finance Department and institutes mandatory overtime for those that remain.
City Council voted to raise the salaries for that office by 80% this week — just one week before the deadline to run for office.
STORY #1 — The Buck Stops Where, Exactly?
The city’s Voter Registrar is in the news again this week and not because there is a primary election next week or huge elections both nationally and locally in November. This week, Graham Moomaw reported in the Virginia Mercury that the city’s Human Resource Department conducted a review of the Registrar’s Office polices and recommended an “immediate departmental restructuring” after their internal investigation following stories about alleged credit card misuse and nepotism in the office. Those findings were sent to state and local officials this week and the Mercury obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
Last month, Samuel Parker at the Times-Dispatch reported that Keith Balmer, the city’s Voter Registrar, had racked up almost $70,000 in charges on the city credit card for things like furniture, art, frequent lunches for the entire staff, and more. Some charges, like travel expenses for staff to a convention in Roanoke, seemed to be normal; but others, like nearly $10,000 spent at the fancy furniture store LaDiff seem a bit excessive for a city expense/office funded by taxpayers. In March, they had also reported there had been allegations of nepotism against the Registrar. This week, Parker at the RTD also reported that Deputy Registrar Jerry Richardson charged nearly $80,000 to her city-issued credit card last year and was also being investigated for nepotism. The city’s Inspector General is looking into the entire mess for any possible further action.
Moomaw’s article in the Mercury details the findings of the city’s Human Resources investigation and also includes a brief summary like the need for reshuffling staff and a closer look at nepotism allegations (and even includes something called the “Nepotism Tree”). And even though Balmer doesn’t report to City Hall or the Mayor, the city’s own investigation said the Registrar is still subject to city policies.
Moomaw wrote: Investigators ruled Balmer and Richardson violated two city administrative regulations. One is an anti-nepotism policy meant to prevent preferential treatment for relatives and ensure employees don’t supervise their relatives. The other is a more general ethics policy outlining rules against using public office for personal gain and conduct that inhibits “the confidence of the public in the integrity of government.”
Voter Registrars are appointed (or removed) by a three-member Electoral Board in each locality and neither Richardson or Balmer are city employees, but the office is funded with city funds and the credit cards are issued by the city. The Registrar’s Office is funded through the city’s budget and will receive $5.2 million this coming year (a slight increase from $4.7 million) and the city’s Procurement Department issues the credit cards for the office.
That is relevant because City Hall has been seriously pretending since the story broke a month ago that the Registrar’s Office is completely separate from the city (but it’s not). Note that Moomaw’s story pointed out that the city’s Human Resources department did the initial internal investigation. Also, these issues were only investigated after they arose in the media, not through internal due diligence. The city oversees (or is supposed to oversee) the credit card usage but the city only cut the credit cards off after the initial story about them broke on May 16.
And even though the investigation in Moomaw’s article was complete almost a month ago, city officials didn’t send the “notice of investigative findings” to state and local election officials until this week — after Moomaw’s FOIA request and the report’s findings were about to become public. The HR department would never send that report anywhere without the approval of the Mayor and CAO.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to RVA 5x5 to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.